In recent decades, it has become increasingly clear that psychological stressors can lead to physical symptoms not only by the ego defence of somatization but also by physical processes involving the ...
According to historian Arthur Herman, Plato and Aristotle can be understood as opposing fundamental frameworks through which to view 2,400 years of philosophical, political, scientific, mathematical, ...
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — When it comes to rhetoric, Plato was right and Aristotle — not so much. ADVERTISING CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — When it comes to rhetoric, Plato was right and Aristotle — not so much ...
S: Gentlemen, welcome. Today’s events warrant review. Who wants to speak first? P: What do you mean, review? It’s clear—this Moses said if God had sent him, the Earth would swallow Korach, the others, ...
CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: Cultural critic Thomas Chatterton Williams examines the complex relationship between the classics and identity politics. And he is speaking to Walter Isaacson about racism, ...
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — When it comes to rhetoric, Plato was right and Aristotle — not so much. Distilled, Aristotle thought rhetoric good for democracy, though his definition of “by the people” was ...
In recent decades, it has become increasingly clear that psychological stressors can lead to physical symptoms not only by the ego defence of somatization but also by physical processes involving the ...
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — When it comes to rhetoric, Plato was right and Aristotle – not so much. Distilled, Aristotle thought rhetoric good for democracy, though his definition of “by the people” was ...
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — When it comes to rhetoric, Plato was right and Aristotle — not so much. Distilled, Aristotle thought rhetoric good for democracy, though his definition of "by the people" was ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback