Due to severe floods in Maharashtra, MCTC has requested a three-day extension for the GSTR-3B filing deadline, citing hardships faced by ...

Gauhati High Court observed that cancellation of GST registration u/s. 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act entails serious civil consequences. Hence, petitioner is given opportunity to furnish all the pending ...

Bombay High Court held that anticipatory bail application in alleged customs duty evasion case allowed since the applicants have demonstrated their willingness to pursue the statutory remedy of ...

ITAT Delhi held that cash deposited during demonetization period cannot be added as unexplained cash deposit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act since sufficient explanation of source of cash ...

Madras High Court held that Look Out Circular [LOC] of person accused in Enforcement Directorate [ED] case is kept in abeyance for specific period and the accused in permitted to travel abroad for ...

Bombay High Court held that combine reading of section 56 and 54(1) of the CGST Act states that interest @9% is payable when amount is not refunded within 60 days from the date of the order passed by ...

Madras High Court held that matter is to be remitted back for fresh orders on merits in view of non-filing of reply and non-attending personal hearing since petitioner has already deposited entire ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 69A towards unexplained cash deposit cannot be sustained since it is reasonably explained that deposit is out of its business proceeds. Accordingly, ...

Orissa High Court held that writ petition against assessment order u/s. 147 read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act is not entertained due to availability of alternative remedy. Accordingly, writ ...

Madras High Court quashes orders disallowing Input Tax Credit (ITC) for FY 2017-2021, citing the new Section 16(5) of the CGST ...

The ITAT Pune has sent back a Rs. 28.71 lakh unexplained cash deposit case to the CIT(A), granting the assessee a fresh opportunity due to alleged unawareness of ...

The Supreme Court of India rules that financial hardship is not a valid ground to waive or reduce the mandatory pre-deposit for filing an ...